Thematic Article
Social entrepreneurship ecosystem development in extreme contexts: a comparative study of Ukraine and the UK
Abstract
This article underscores the need for social entrepreneurship ecosystem research in extreme contexts to conceptualise the idiosyncrasies of crisis-induced dynamics and ecosystem building during significant disruption. To address these critical research needs, this article develops theoretical understanding through empirical insights from practitioners’ experiences. By integrating my empirical findings, I develop a theoretical framework that illuminates how social entrepreneurs resourcefully navigate institutional contexts by leveraging four key pillars—government policy and regulatory framework, funding and finance, social capital, and educational and scientific potential. This understanding contributes to both theoretical conceptualisation and practical approaches to ecosystem development, particularly in addressing systemic challenges of limited awareness, effective cross-sector collaboration, and financial sustainability. Methodologically, this research employs an inductive, qualitative study through semi-structured interviews with Ukrainian and British social entrepreneurs. Comparative analytical techniques examine how practitioners operating in extreme contexts conceptualise their ecosystem models and navigate complex stakeholder relationships within contrasting institutional environments. This article is published in the Thematic Collection ‘Researchers at Risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
Keywords
social entrepreneurshipecosystemextreme contextssystemic challengesfinancial sustainabilitystakeholder relationshipscross-sector collaborationCopyright statement
© The author(s) 2025. This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International LicenseCite this article
Revko, A. (2025), ‘Social entrepreneurship ecosystem development in extreme contexts: a comparative study of Ukraine and the UK’, Journal of the British Academy, 13(4): a45 https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/013.a45crossref
dimensions
Article metrices
View count: 46
Download count: 3
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
The ‘culture wars’ that dominate public discourse in the UK turn, very often, on the significance accorded to histories of empire, slavery, and colonialism. What seems to be primarily of concern is the place of such histories in the telling of our national story. In this section, the articles explore different ways in which we could think about the relationship of the past with the present. Specifically, the articles collected here use the frame of ‘reparative histories’ as a potentially more effective way of engaging with complex and contested pasts. They address the idea of a reparatory sociology, colonial photography, representation and indigenous spaces, the gendering of reparative histories, and the need to rethink the welfare state from such a perspective.
‘Coming to terms with racial capitalism’ brings together three scholars from the disciplines of History, Geography, and Sociology to open up consideration of this increasingly popular concept. This is done by engaging the idea of ‘racial capitalism’ with the historical role of colonialism in Jamaica, Latin America, and Ireland. Each author draws on the resources of their discipline to locate the concept within debates such as Black Marxism and to consider it in relation to discussions about Indigenous rights and questions of racism. Catherine Hall offers a case study of one temporal and spatial instance of racial capitalism in the mid-18th-century Atlantic world. Sarah A. Radcliffe examines the place of Indigenous peoples in the racial colonial capitalism of Latin America. The final paper by Gurminder K. Bhambra argues for the significance of colonialism to understandings of capitalism through an examination of Irish colonial history.
No Data Found
