EXPLORE LATEST CONTENT
Dive into our rich repository of articles covering diverse topics and insights

Andrew Hadfield, Elizabeth Edwards, Fiona Williams, Angela McRobbie
The Editors introduce the fourth issue of Volume 13 of the Journal of the British Academy. This Introduction includes an overview of the content of the issue.
5 December 2025

Alona Revko
This article underscores the need for social entrepreneurship ecosystem research in extreme contexts to conceptualise the idiosyncrasies of crisis-induced dynamics and ecosystem building during significant disruption. To address these critical research needs, this article develops theoretical understanding through empirical insights from practitioners’ experiences. By integrating my empirical findings, I develop a theoretical framework that illuminates how social entrepreneurs resourcefully navigate institutional contexts by leveraging four key pillars—government policy and regulatory framework, funding and finance, social capital, and educational and scientific potential. This understanding contributes to both theoretical conceptualisation and practical approaches to ecosystem development, particularly in addressing systemic challenges of limited awareness, effective cross-sector collaboration, and financial sustainability. Methodologically, this research employs an inductive, qualitative study through semi-structured interviews with Ukrainian and British social entrepreneurs. Comparative analytical techniques examine how practitioners operating in extreme contexts conceptualise their ecosystem models and navigate complex stakeholder relationships within contrasting institutional environments. This article is published in the Thematic Collection ‘Researchers at Risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
3 December 2025

Vitaliy Shpachuk, Victoria Vdovychenko
Economic security, particularly economic viability, is a critical pillar of national security, underpinning a state’s sovereignty, stability, and long-term prosperity. While standard economic theories and textbooks typically address economic dynamics under conditions of peace, far less attention has been paid to how economies operate during and after periods of armed conflict, despite the increasing frequency of such events worldwide in recent years. The Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has not only severely undermined Ukraine’s economic security but has also contributed to broader global repercussion, including economic slowdowns, substantial financial losses, heightened inflation, rising debt burdens, and increased poverty levels in various parts of the world. This article seeks to address this analytical gap by examining the state of economic security in Ukraine amid wartime conditions, with particular emphasis on economic viability, business impacts, associated risks, and emergent opportunities. Using a ‘5D’ approach together with the ‘strategic trilemma’, the Ukrainian case offers insights for international investors contemplating engagement in conflict-affected environments and provides a foundational basis for further scholarly inquiry into the relationship between war and economic resilience. This article is published in the Thematic Collection ‘Researchers at Risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
3 December 2025

Alona Revko
This article underscores the need for social entrepreneurship ecosystem research in extreme contexts to conceptualise the idiosyncrasies of crisis-induced dynamics and ecosystem building during significant disruption. To address these critical research needs, this article develops theoretical understanding through empirical insights from practitioners’ experiences. By integrating my empirical findings, I develop a theoretical framework that illuminates how social entrepreneurs resourcefully navigate institutional contexts by leveraging four key pillars—government policy and regulatory framework, funding and finance, social capital, and educational and scientific potential. This understanding contributes to both theoretical conceptualisation and practical approaches to ecosystem development, particularly in addressing systemic challenges of limited awareness, effective cross-sector collaboration, and financial sustainability. Methodologically, this research employs an inductive, qualitative study through semi-structured interviews with Ukrainian and British social entrepreneurs. Comparative analytical techniques examine how practitioners operating in extreme contexts conceptualise their ecosystem models and navigate complex stakeholder relationships within contrasting institutional environments. This article is published in the Thematic Collection ‘Researchers at Risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
3 December 2025

Vitaliy Shpachuk, Victoria Vdovychenko
Economic security, particularly economic viability, is a critical pillar of national security, underpinning a state’s sovereignty, stability, and long-term prosperity. While standard economic theories and textbooks typically address economic dynamics under conditions of peace, far less attention has been paid to how economies operate during and after periods of armed conflict, despite the increasing frequency of such events worldwide in recent years. The Russian Federation’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine has not only severely undermined Ukraine’s economic security but has also contributed to broader global repercussion, including economic slowdowns, substantial financial losses, heightened inflation, rising debt burdens, and increased poverty levels in various parts of the world. This article seeks to address this analytical gap by examining the state of economic security in Ukraine amid wartime conditions, with particular emphasis on economic viability, business impacts, associated risks, and emergent opportunities. Using a ‘5D’ approach together with the ‘strategic trilemma’, the Ukrainian case offers insights for international investors contemplating engagement in conflict-affected environments and provides a foundational basis for further scholarly inquiry into the relationship between war and economic resilience. This article is published in the Thematic Collection ‘Researchers at Risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
3 December 2025

Oksana Torubara
This article examines forced academic migration by asking how displaced Ukrainian scholars reconstruct their careers and identities in exile. Drawing on survey data from 125 researchers-at-risk and follow-up interviews, it analyses participants’ demographic and disciplinary diversity, pathways into the UK, and configurations of institutional support. The findings reveal a strongly gendered pattern of mobility, with a majority of women arriving with children and navigating the dual pressures of caregiving and scholarly productivity. Host universities provide uneven assistance, shaping prospects for belonging and professional reintegration. Despite severe disruption, scholars demonstrate resilience and sustained intellectual contributions. By situating individual trajectories within broader logics of displacement, this portrait calls for more context-sensitive support for academic refugees and invites reflection on what it means to host, to belong, and to rebuild a scholarly life across borders and amidst crisis. This article is published in the thematic collection ‘Researchers at risk: the view from Ukrainians in the UK’.
3 December 2025

Annelies Kusters
International Sign (IS) emerged through interaction among deaf people from different countries. Incorporating signs from various sign languages and drawing on shared visual-grammatical strategies, IS is widely used in transnational contexts, such as conferences, trainings, and online platforms. IS involves ‘calibration’: adjusting to diverse interlocutors and settings. Yet IS is also increasingly regimented by frequent use, dictionaries, teaching practices, and interpreting provision. This article identifies six paradoxes emerging from its regimentation: ‘visual signing’ strategies are both highly valued and a last resort in calibration; IS is both innate and learned in courses; IS thrives on flexibility, yet requires boundaries; in IS, understandability is a central goal, yet it is only partially achieved; IS interpreting provisions improve but also restrict access; and IS not only bridges languages but also changes them. These paradoxes culminate in a central paradox: IS thrives on calibration, yet is increasingly sustained through regimentation.
2 December 2025
News
Suggestions for a thematic collection of articles are welcome from those who have been supported through any of the British Academy's programmes and activities and from Fellows of the British Academy. See Information for Guest Editors for more information.
