Normal View Dyslexic View

Commentary

Philosophy in prison

M.M. McCabe*†M.M. McCabe*††

Mary Margaret McCabe (‘MM’) works on ancient philosophy, on ethics and on the philosophy of medicine; she has published mostly on Plato, but also on the Presocratics, on Aristotle and on the Stoics, as well as on topics in contemporary ethics and medicine. She was Professor of Ancient Philosophy at King’s College London from 1998 to her retirement in 2014, and thereafter Professor of Philosophy Emerita. She is a Fellow of the British Academy and was President of the British Philosophical Association (2008–12), of the Mind Association (2016–17), and of the Aristotelian Society (2022-23). She is Chair of Trustees of the charity Philosophy in Prison.

mm.mccabe@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

The UK prison system is in crisis: overcrowded, understaffed, ill fitted to whatever purpose imprisonment might be intended to have. Prison education is particularly under pressure, especially since a majority of prisoners are functionally illiterate. The charity Philosophy in Prison seeks to address the complex problems of prison education by offering philosophical conversations in prisons: oral, so accessible to most, but driven by difficult philosophical questions that are puzzling to anyone. This process faces down the disadvantage suffered by many within the criminal justice system, that their voices are not heard (the problem of epistemic injustice). For these conversations have an equalising effect, since the problems they address are puzzling to anyone, whether new to it or expert. That general puzzlement allows the participant both to see the viewpoints of others, and to have their own viewpoint seen by others. This matters: it shows each prisoner that they do have standing, in themselves, after all. (This article is published in the thematic collection ‘The arts and humanities: rethinking value for today—views from Fellows of the British Academy’, edited by Isobel Armstrong.)

Keywords

UK prison systemprison educationphilosophy in Prisonphilosophical conversationepistemic injusticeequalising effect
Download PDF
Cite

Related Articles

Cover image for the article
Trusting the permanence of self for people with Alzheimer’s disease

Gloria Frisone

Although informed consent is rooted in the growing affirmation of the subject’s autonomy, medical anthropology has highlighted the inherent limits of this procedural notion. My ethnographic research in neurological and geriatric clinics between France and Italy showed the triangular (dis)trust relationship—between older people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), their doctor, and their caregiver. Following their cognitive decline and loss of autonomy, people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) could be victims of epistemic injustice in two specific moments of the illness: the diagnostic disclosure and the institution of legal protection. If the diagnostic information diminishes the patient’s credibility, the institution of legal protection undermines the patient’s social identity and legal status. However, when caregivers preserve an unconditional trust in the permanence of the patient’s subjective identity, this trust may be conveyed to clinical teams, significantly improving the therapeutic relationship, the course of the disease, and the quality of life for all the actors involved.

10.5871/jba/011s6.103
19 December 2023
Cover image for the article
The Grangemouth oil refinery closure: lessons for ‘just transition’ governance

Riyoko Shibe, Ewan Gibbs

In November 2023, Petroineos announced the closure of Scotland’s only oil refinery at Grangemouth by 2025. Grangemouth is widely perceived as a ‘litmus test’ for the Scottish Government’s commitment to a ‘just transition’ for workers in the oil and gas industry to steer them on an orderly movement towards suitable employment in green energy production. The announcement came as a shock and disrupted just transition planning developed in Scotland since the late 2010s. Power imbalances between Petroineos and the Scottish Government and the workforce and trade unions demonstrate the difficulties of organising transition in a sector dominated by large multinationals subject to minimal accountability or transparency. This paper demonstrates the value of historically, economically and politically grounded policy analysis for achieving net zero. It assesses the Grangemouth closure announcement, focusing on governance mechanisms, UK, Scottish and local policy coordination, transparency and long-term planning challenges, particularly for net zero, energy policy, renewables and deindustrialisation. This article is published in the thematic collection ‘The critical role of governance for decarbonisation at pace: learning the lessons from SHAPE research’, edited by Sarah Birch, Hilary Graham, Andrew Jordan, Tim O’Riordan, Henry Richards.

10.5871/jba/013.a11
20 March 2025
Load More

Thematic article

Normal View Dyslexic View

Philosophy in prison

M.M. McCabe*†M.M. McCabe*††

Mary Margaret McCabe (‘MM’) works on ancient philosophy, on ethics and on the philosophy of medicine; she has published mostly on Plato, but also on the Presocratics, on Aristotle and on the Stoics, as well as on topics in contemporary ethics and medicine. She was Professor of Ancient Philosophy at King’s College London from 1998 to her retirement in 2014, and thereafter Professor of Philosophy Emerita. She is a Fellow of the British Academy and was President of the British Philosophical Association (2008–12), of the Mind Association (2016–17), and of the Aristotelian Society (2022-23). She is Chair of Trustees of the charity Philosophy in Prison.

mm.mccabe@kcl.ac.uk