Research Article
The place of theory in Babylonian astral science
Abstract
Babylonian astral science of the 1st millennium BC was a multi-faceted practice including detailed and systematic astronomical observation, the development and use of various computational methods for predicting the positions and phenomena of the sun, moon, and planets, descriptions using simple numerical schemes of regular changes in the celestial realm, and various forms of astrology. Despite the detailed study of these practices over the past 150 years or so, historians of science remain divided as to whether Babylonian astronomy should be classified as a ‘science’. Specialists of Babylonian astronomy and astrology uniformly agree that it is science, whereas some non-specialists argue that science is a uniquely Greek invention. Much of this disagreement comes down to the question of whether Babylonian astral science is ‘theoretical’ or (merely) the fitting of numbers to empirical data. In this paper, I explore whether we can identify ‘theories’ within Babylonian astral science and if so where these are to be found.
Keywords
astral scienceBabylonian astronomyBabylonian astrologysciencetheoriesCopyright statement © The author(s) 2025. This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License
Cite this article Steele, J. (2025), ‘The place of theory in Babylonian astral science’, Journal of the British Academy, 13(3): a32 https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/013.a32

No Data Found

No Data Found

No Data Found
Governance lies at the heart of overcoming the Climate Emergency, where political barriers often impede the implementation of technical and administrative solutions. This paper examines subnational investment in the UK as a critical governance challenge, arguing that its competitive and economically driven frameworks exacerbate inequalities between local authorities. Drawing on SHAPE (Social Sciences, Humanities and the Arts for People and the Economy) research and a case study of Aberdeen City Council’s hydrogen transport initiatives, the paper derives guiding principles for transforming subnational investment, advocating for an approach that prioritises collaboration over competition, strives for an equitable distribution of roles and responsibilities, and ultimately empowers local leadership. This reassessment is a critical step forward, acknowledging that business-as-usual governance is failing to accelerate progress towards Net Zero. By rethinking our foundational principles, we open the door to transformative change, ensuring that subnational investment aligns with the strengths of local authorities and the urgency and scale of the challenges we face. This article is published in the thematic collection ‘The critical role of governance for decarbonisation at pace: learning the lessons from SHAPE research’, edited by Sarah Birch, Hilary Graham, Andrew Jordan, Tim O’Riordan, Henry Richards.
This article introduces the thematic collection, ‘The critical role of governance for decarbonisation at pace: learning the lessons from SHAPE research’, edited by Sarah Birch, Hilary Graham, Andrew Jordan, Tim O’Riordan, and Henry Richards. With confirmation that global average temperatures in 2024 exceeded 1.5° above pre-industrial levels, and near continuous news of extreme weather events around the world, there seems little to dispute the characterisation of UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, that ‘every country must deliver and play their rightful part’. Guterres and many others point to the urgency of action, even though it is palpably sluggish. In the collection, we argue that SHAPE (Social Science, Humanities, and the Arts for People, Economy and environment) research provides the essential lynchpin for policymakers to understand people, societies, economies, and cultures and what works in practice to bring about the transformative changes needed to respond to this challenge. The common thread of this collection is governance. Governance provides the political and civic mechanisms to deliberate and make inclusive decisions based on evidence and collective judgements about our shared future. The collection features crucial policy insights drawn from SHAPE research to advance the principles and practices of consensual governance, and to help navigate ‘an exit off the highway to climate hell’.

No Data Found
