Thematic Article
Citizen deliberation in Net Zero governance: learning lessons and looking forward
,
Abstract
Since 2019, public and third-sector bodies across the UK have been experimenting with citizens’ juries and assemblies in the context of net-zero governance—collectively referred to in this essay as ‘climate assemblies’. These assemblies bring together a representative sample of citizens to learn about and discuss policy issues, prior to making recommendations for action. With the UK off track to meet it’s 2030 climate targets, advocates hope these fora can drive policy on net zero that is both ambitious and garners public support. This essay draws on social science evidence to appraises the recent wave of climate assemblies against four often-cited objectives for such processes: providing knowledge to policymakers about public preferences and lived experiences; encouraging policy action by demonstrating a public mandate; improving public trust in leaders and governance institutions; and providing a mechanism for oversight and accountability. We show that the first of these objectives has largely been met. Climate assemblies have also succeeded in demonstrating a mandate in terms of proposals being consistently ahead of existing policy, although there are no clear cases of climate assemblies increasing policy ambition. Climate assemblies can help build trust amongst those taking part, but this dissipates if the commissioning body is not subsequently seen to act. Climate assemblies are not widely known about amongst the wider population, and there is a lack of evidence on how they impact trust perceptions amongst those who do hear of them. Finally, there are very few examples of assemblies being tasked with an oversight or accountability role, an area we suggest could benefit from further experimentation. We conclude with a series of recommendations for further embedding climate juries within net-zero governance, aimed at improving their ability to contribute to the net-zero transition. This article is published in the thematic collection ‘The critical role of governance for decarbonisation at pace: learning the lessons from SHAPE research’, edited by Sarah Birch, Hilary Graham, Andrew Jordan, Tim O’Riordan, Henry Richards.
Keywords
climate assembliesnet zero governancecitizens’ juriespublic trustoversightaccountabilitypublic preferenceCopyright statement
© The author(s) 2025. This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International LicenseCite this article
Ainscough, J., Killen, L., Lewis, P., Shepherd, A. & Willis, R. (2025), ‘Citizen deliberation in Net Zero governance: learning lessons and looking forward’, Journal of the British Academy, 13(1): a13 https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/013.a13crossref
dimensions
Article metrices
View count: 739
Download count: 45
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
This article introduces the Thematic Collection ‘Decolonising Gender Knowledge in Sub-Saharan Africa: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Innovations from Early Career Researchers’, edited by Alicia Bowman, Evelyn Garwe and Juliet Thondhlana. It highlights the under-representation of Global South scholars, particularly early career researchers (ECRs), in gender knowledge production in the region and advocates for grounding the study of gender in Africa in local realities and knowledge systems, in line with African feminist perspectives. Moreover, the article positions the collection as a powerful step towards decoloniality not simply by amplifying African perspectives, but by actively creating space for African scholars to shape the future of gender studies. The article discusses how the Thematic Collection fostered the co-production of knowledge by empowering African scholars to develop their own research questions and methodologies, free from Eurocentric constraints, thus promoting complete epistemic freedom. It also showcases the interdisciplinary nature of the Thematic Collection, spanning gender studies, higher education, and legal, labour, and urban studies. Overall, the introduction argues that, by centring the research of African ECRs, established power dynamics can be disrupted, and the dominance of Western-centric paradigms can be challenged.
Young people worldwide are engaged in diverse forms of participation which offer a pathway for demanding accountability from governance actors. In contexts with fragile governance structures, young people face a unique set of challenges in their efforts to demand accountability or participate in decision-making. The expected relationship between participation and accountability as understood in liberal, democratic settings is often absent and instead demands for accountability are often made through strategies ‘at the margins’. Using Palestine as a case study, we show how young people look for accountability beyond state institutions and the national scale, using diverse strategies depending on their embedded position in society. This analysis sheds light on the complex reality of youth participation and accountability mechanisms in socially, politically and physically contested spaces and, by extension, points towards challenges and opportunities in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals.
No Data Found
