Research Article
Development, subtraction and the Indigenous peoples of Paraguay
Abstract
This article deals with the very emblematic, but largely understudied, trajectory of national and local development in Paraguay, which is an example of a subtractive geography that produces spaces that are, in aggregate, less than before. Subtraction is an old driving force of nation-building as it connects the subtractive colonial past with the cultivated deserts of hyper-neoliberal agribusiness. The production of Paraguayan spaces has been based on the subtractive inclinations of its military–agrarian ruling elite, which compromised the national territory in tragic wars with regional neighbours and, since the end of the 19th century, the selling of land to foreigners and international companies. The subtractive pattern of a subordinate and aggressive capitalist development has been especially predicated upon the negation of the most fundamental rights and entitlements of Indigenous peoples. The discussion is based on research dedicated to understanding the struggle of the Paĩ Tavyterã Indigenous nation. Despite systematic denunciation of the anti-Indigenous direction of development by national and international organisations, the ancestral territories of the Paĩ Tavyterã have been under attack and they have been treated as generic citizens and cheap labourers. At the same time, the response of Indigenous peoples and other sectors of the working class has emerged in the form of anti-subtraction reactions. Decolonisation is, first and foremost, an anti-subtraction movement that aims at reverting the deficit caused by systemic subtraction and collectively seeking for social, political and spatial additions.
Keywords
developmentagribusinessIndigenous peoplesworking classPaĩ Tavyterãancestral territoriessubtractive geographyParaguayCopyright statement
© The author(s) 2024. This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International LicenseCite this article
Ioris, A.A.R. (2024), ‘Development, subtraction and the Indigenous peoples of Paraguay’, Journal of the British Academy, 12(1/2): a05 https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/012.a05crossref
dimensions
Article metrices
View count: 163
Download count: 0
No Data Found
No Data Found
No Data Found
In this article, I focus on Guarani Indigenous peoples’ modalities of relating to, trusting, and distrusting the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS) and its agents during the Covid-19 pandemic. I compare relational configurations as a means to understand the reasons for a low take-up of Covid-19 vaccines among Kaiowá collectives in the first moment yet a high rate of vaccination among the Mbyá. I also discuss conceptions of health and the body in light of a guiding framework that aims to reflect on epidemiological protocols that sometimes are disconnected from the Indigenous dynamics and end up clashing counterproductively with their care technologies.
Today the purpose of a university education is under question. Should it provide technicians and workers for productivity and international competition? Should it be a liberal education, interdisciplinary and problem-solving, preparing informed subjects/citizens for democratic decision-making? Should it be private, focussed on vocational training, funded by tuition from the rich, in institutions founded by philanthropists or entrepreneurs? Should it be public, managed as a bureaucratic corporation, with a parafaculty of public relations and advertising specialists, a driver of global enterprise? Or should it be mentored like a guild or college by self-motivating and self-regulating professionals who have internalised the means and mechanisms of their disciplines? Have we moved from provincial institutions training local elites to global institutions recruiting international talent? From the perspective of the student, should it prepare for a professional workforce or prepare for a fulfilling life and a good society? Will it continue to prepare for both? Ideological answers to these questions are rampant and global, not at all confined to Higher Education in the United Kingdom. As we go to press, a new government in the UK has offered détente on the Culture Wars and is attempting to reassure international students that they are again welcome. Yet such assurances arrive without the government committing to budgets for institutions ‘exiting the market’ (Hogan 2024, ‘UKRI plans for “scenario of a university exiting the market”’. Research Professional News/ Research Fortnight 4 September 2024). In October 2024, Fellows of the British Academy organized a private series of panels on ‘Recent Closures and Threats of Closure in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Opening Up’ with the goal of advising ways for universities to economise without losing essential aspects of education for a good society. Some of the presentations are collected here, with this Introduction providing some geopolitical, political economic, and historical contexts. This article is published in the thematic collection ‘On recent closures and threats of closure in the Humanities and Social Sciences’, edited by Regenia Gagnier.
No Data Found
